Could Miracle Mile get a diagonal crosswalk? Board sends ‘scramble’ intersection idea to Commission

Artist’s rendering of the Miracle Mile and Ponce de Leon Boulevard intersection with diagonal pedestrian crosswalks forming an X across the center of the roadway.

By Coral Gables Gazette staff

The possibility of having a scramble crosswalk – a crosswalk that includes a diagonal pathway as well as regular ones between streets where all pedestrians cross from all direction while traffic is stopped – at the city’s signature intersection of Miracle Mile and Ponce de Leon took a step closer to becoming a reality with the city’s Transportation Advisory Board calling for an official study on the matter.

The board voted 4-1 to recommend the study to the Coral Gables Commission, which would have to take definitive action in order for the necessary allocation of funds to move forward with further research.

The vote and more discussion unfolded at the board’s December 16 meeting with growing interest from residents and some board members who say the busy intersection would benefit from a pedestrian-focused redesign. A pedestrian scramble crosswalk, also known as a Barnes Dance, allows pedestrians to cross in all directions, including diagonally, during a dedicated signal phase when all vehicle traffic is stopped.

Advertisement

Resident Roberta Neway, who lives in the 1200 Alhambra Circle and previously served on a city advisory board, spoke passionately in favor of the idea, drawing on her personal experience with a scramble intersection at the intersection of Red Road and Sunset Drive at the border of Coral Gables and South Miami.

“I’ve been crossing the intersection of Red Road and Sunset Drive on my own since I was eight or nine years old,” Neway told the board. “That’s an awful lot of years now — like a lifetime. And with the diagonal crossing, it’s the first time I feel safe. I feel comfortable crossing at that intersection.”

Neway said she walks and drives regularly and understands the frustration of traffic delays, but argued that safety should come first. “I don’t like waiting either,” she said. “But I know it’s for a good reason. If you want to welcome pedestrians into our downtown and have people walking, shopping and eating out instead of just driving through, this is one of the ways to do it.”

Assistant Transportation Director Melissa De Zayas provided key context, explaining that when staff reached out to Miami-Dade County about the process for approving scramble crosswalks, they discovered there essentially is none.

“There currently is no process for it because they don’t typically recommend them for intersections,” De Zayas said. She added that despite previous mentions of the idea, the board had never given clear direction on whether it wanted staff to formally pursue it. “We kind of need to determine whether the TAB is in favor of moving forward with this type of recommendation,” she said.

Transportation Advisory Board Chairperson Roland Rodriguez said he supported commissioning a study, pointing to successful examples elsewhere. “I’ve seen it work on Sunset and 57th, and there’s one in Brickell as well,” he said. “I think it’s an effective and safe way for pedestrians to cross, especially at a busy intersection like this.”

Board member Ed Santamaria described himself as “agnostic,” but said data would help guide a decision. “I’d like to see a study that looks at pedestrian safety and the impact on traffic, because ultimately Miami-Dade County is going to weigh in, and they’re very protective of their (roads).”

Board Member Henry Pino again voiced opposition, citing concerns about congestion and a lack of supporting data. “I don’t think we have the pedestrian density, and I’ve not seen any accident data to suggest there’s an imminent safety need,” he said. Pino questioned whether spending “tens of thousands of dollars” on a study was justified.

Rodriguez responded that the vote was not for implementation, but simply to gather facts. “This would be a full traffic study — vehicles per day, pedestrian counts, backups in each direction,” he said. “Then the commission would decide whether it makes sense.”

Neway urged the board to consider quality of life. “A minute or half a minute of extra waiting is not too long for people to feel safe crossing a main intersection in a downtown,” she said. “The purpose of this board is to represent everyone.”

With most members expressing interest in learning more, the board ultimately voted to recommend a study to the City Commission, keeping the debate alive and placing the future of a scramble crosswalk at Miracle Mile and Ponce de Leon squarely in the commission’s hands.

Bike and pedestrian Master Plan and rideshare updates

Attending his first meeting, recently appointed board member Thomas Snook expressed concerns over safety of cyclists in the city – adding that he himself had been hit by a car near the entrance of the University of Miami in the past.

The board discussed updating the city’s Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan created in 2014. After entertaining a notion that individual board members would review the plan and how it pertained to their districts, the board agreed to have staff give them a brief update on the master plan to see what aspects of it had been implemented and whether other parts were still relevant.

The board also continued its discussion on effects of rideshare services both for deliveries and rider transport. With regard to the delivery pick ups on Miracle Mile and nearby alleys – where drivers sometimes wait for the deliveries – a police department representative said there shouldn’t be an issue if drivers don’t block or obstruct traffic in the back of restaurants.

“It’s not too much of an issue if they don’t abandon their vehicles,” Rodriguez said.

The officer also said that the police department couldn’t do much to discourage rideshare drivers of parking in certain parts of the city, including next to Cartagena Plaza (Coco Plum Circle) because parking was free there. 

Coral Gables Gazette News Staff
Author: Coral Gables Gazette News Staff

Originally established in 1996 and relaunched as a digital publication in February 2025, the Coral Gables Gazette is an independent local news organization dedicated to factual, objective and accountable community journalism. Our newsroom reports on the people, policies, institutions and events shaping Coral Gables, Florida, providing residents with timely, informative coverage of the issues affecting their community. Our reporting includes City Hall, local government, municipal elections, public spending, real estate development, business, education, arts and culture, and neighborhood affairs throughout the City Beautiful. We follow City Commission decisions, examine public records and report on the businesses, organizations and individuals contributing to Coral Gables. We believe informed residents are essential to a healthy, engaged community. Stories published under the Coral Gables Gazette News Staff byline are prepared or compiled by the publication's editorial team. We strive for accuracy, fairness, transparency and clear distinctions between news reporting, opinion and advertising. Readers are encouraged to submit news tips, corrections, editorial inquiries and story suggestions through our Contact page and learn more about our standards through our Editorial Policy.

Share:
Gazette News Dept.

Author: Coral Gables Gazette News Staff

Originally established in 1996 and relaunched as a digital publication in February 2025, the Coral Gables Gazette is an independent local news organization dedicated to factual, objective and accountable community journalism. Our newsroom reports on the people, policies, institutions and events shaping Coral Gables, Florida, providing residents with timely, informative coverage of the issues affecting their community. Our reporting includes City Hall, local government, municipal elections, public spending, real estate development, business, education, arts and culture, and neighborhood affairs throughout the City Beautiful. We follow City Commission decisions, examine public records and report on the businesses, organizations and individuals contributing to Coral Gables. We believe informed residents are essential to a healthy, engaged community. Stories published under the Coral Gables Gazette News Staff byline are prepared or compiled by the publication's editorial team. We strive for accuracy, fairness, transparency and clear distinctions between news reporting, opinion and advertising. Readers are encouraged to submit news tips, corrections, editorial inquiries and story suggestions through our Contact page and learn more about our standards through our Editorial Policy.

Related Articles

10 thoughts on “Could Miracle Mile get a diagonal crosswalk? Board sends ‘scramble’ intersection idea to Commission”

  1. I live this crosswalk at red and sunset in south miami. For walkers it’s is great but for traffic it is a nightmare. Especially in an area that is congested by too many cars, density and traffic. It makes the light several minutes longer and you can not turn on red. In South Miami it has made a mess during day hours with traffic backed up to almost 80th , and it takes several lights to go thru. It could be 15 minutes on sunset. Sorry, but you should not have both. Over built traffic and then major delays with the crosswalks. Reminds me why I never ever go to downtown coral gables. Never miracle mile with traffic and poor parking. You all are shooting yourselves in your foot.

  2. Before the commission undertakes a new study, I’d like to highlight a major safety concern: many key intersections lack updated lighting systems synced with pedestrian lights. At several intersections, pedestrians must push a button to cross, but the timing’s often off, and if missed, the light won’t activate. This is hazardous.

    Specifically, intersections on Miracle Mile, Ponce de Leon, Lejeune Ave, and Salzedo St are problematic. I’ve reported this to Miami’s traffic department, but the outdated systems can’t be fixed. I’d like this addressed before exploring new features

  3. This is Henry Pinera, the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) member that voted against recommending that this go to commission. I did not feel that a single person advocating for a scramble cross walk should justify spending tens of thousands of dollars just on a study. While I really respect Ms. Neway and have often sided with her on many positions, the TAB should be relying on data or larger numbers of individuals coming and advocating for improvements. We highly encourage the public to engage civically and advocate for the improvements of the community.

    I also live close to Red and Sunset and have experienced first hand the traffic delays for an area with a relatively small number of pedestrians. Traffic has notably worsened since the implementation.

Leave a Reply