By the Coral Gables Gazette editorial board
The proposal to revert two parcels at 627 and 635 Anastasia Avenue from Special Use to Multi-family 3 zoning may appear, at first glance, to be a straightforward housekeeping measure. The properties’ current Religious/Institutional designation reflects their former use, not their present surroundings. Adjusting the zoning to match the multi-family buildings nearby would, the applicant argues, bring the map into alignment with reality.
But location matters, and here, it matters a great deal. These two lots sit directly across from Somerset Academy Gables, a charter school with daily drop-offs and pick-ups that already strain the curb space, and just steps from the Coral Gables War Memorial Youth Center, a hub for recreation and community programs. This is a corner where the city’s civic, educational, and residential worlds converge — and any change in use will ripple beyond the property lines.
It is also worth noting that the current owner is the University Baptist Church of Coral Gables, which owns the Somerset Academy property across the street. This connection underscores that the parcels are not merely isolated plots on the map; they are part of a larger institutional footprint in this high-traffic civic corridor. A zoning shift here could become a catalyst for broader changes in how this area is used and experienced.
Under the proposed change, the parcels would shift from a classification that limits them to institutional use to one that allows low-density multi-family housing, capped at three stories and a modest number of units per acre. It is far less intense than the city’s high-density districts, yet still a notable shift from the single-family neighborhoods nearby. That difference — small on paper, significant in practice — is precisely why the city’s review process exists.
The core question is not whether the zoning category “matches” its neighbors in a technical sense. The real measure is whether redevelopment here will make this busy intersection safer, more functional, and more harmonious — or whether it will compound the congestion, strain, and design discord that can arise when growth is handled without foresight.
Traffic and pedestrian safety deserve early, explicit attention. Anyone who has navigated Anastasia and Segovia during the morning or afternoon school rush knows how quickly the street can bottleneck. Parents double-park. Children dart across the road. Youth Center visitors come and go. Add more residents without a plan for safe crossings, adequate on-site parking, and possible traffic-calming measures, and the problem worsens. The city should require a traffic impact study before any binding vote on the change, with results that are publicly available and meaningfully discussed.
Design is the other critical piece. This corner helps frame one of Coral Gables’ most active civic spaces. New construction here should feel like part of that civic landscape — not simply a private enclave. That means architecture that reflects the scale, style, and landscaping traditions of the Gables, with special attention to how it meets the street. A building that transitions gracefully between the Youth Center’s public energy and the quieter residential blocks beyond can be an asset. One that ignores context will stand out for all the wrong reasons.
Public engagement is a necessity. This week’s Planning and Zoning Board meeting is only a conceptual review, but it offers residents and neighbors their best chance to shape the conversation early. Once a project advances to formal approvals, options narrow. Parents of Somerset Academy students, Youth Center members, nearby homeowners, and the broader public should attend, speak, and suggest ways the site can meet housing needs while preserving safety and character.
The Anastasia Avenue parcels present an opportunity to prove that balance is still achievable, reinforcing the principle that proximity to public amenities can be a strength. Without such planning, the city risks setting a precedent where institutional land becomes a quick path to development without adequate safeguards. The right answer is a conditional yes — conditioned on a plan that addresses traffic, design, and community needs from the outset. Get it right here, and Coral Gables will have a model for integrating new housing into sensitive civic locations. Get it wrong, and the consequences will be felt every school day, every Youth Center program, and every rush-hour bottleneck for years to come.



This Post Has 2 Comments
Are people aware that Somerset is applying to increase their enrollment from 260 students to 700 despite having a legal settlement agreement with the Biltmore Neighborhood Association??? This is an egregious assault on our neighborhood and on a legally settled 2002 compromise, as well producing choking traffic throughout the area. Worth noting: 90% of currently enrolled students live outside Coral Gables.
Unfortunately, residents are rarely aware of most of the real issues facing our city. Somerset wants to invalidate the agreement, and I bet the majority on the commission will ultimately allow it. The impact will affect the quality of life of the surrounding neighborhood in myriad ways, but that doesn’t seem to matter any more. The same as legal agreements no longer matter if they can be somehow circumvented.
It’s a bad combination…uninvolved, uninformed residents and a self-serving majority on the commission who feel they don’t have to follow the rules.
Now is the time to make our voices heard, if there is any hope of stopping this.