Coral Gables construction board to weigh unpermitted work, historic violations

152 Almeria Avenue is cited for repainting a building in a historic district without approval.
152 Almeria Avenue in Coral Gables is cited for repainting a building in a historic district without approval.

The Coral Gables Construction Regulation Board will meet Monday, July 14 to review a range of construction violations that underscore the city’s rigorous oversight of permitting, historic preservation and design standards. The cases span residential neighborhoods and commercial corridors, with alleged infractions that include unpermitted demolitions, expired permits and work conducted without mandatory approvals.

The meeting begins at 2 p.m. in the first-floor conference room of City Hall at 427 Biltmore Way. Members of the public may attend in person, participate via Zoom, or call in by phone.

Major violations: unpermitted demolition and expired permits

Among the most serious cases on the docket is 1021 Hardee Road, where city inspectors allege the owner undertook partial demolition of the property without valid permits. According to the city’s case file, two permits for alterations and driveway work expired in 2023, yet construction activity resumed. Inspectors noted the removal of windows, doors, and roofing components. A notice of violation was issued last year, and city staff now recommend the owner obtain after-the-fact permits and resolve all outstanding code issues.

Another case involving multiple expired permits and unpermitted work is scheduled for 631 San Lorenzo Avenue. The city alleges that kitchen and bathroom renovations were completed without inspections or approvals. A neighbor’s complaint led to the investigation. The owner has since retained a contractor to bring the property into compliance, according to staff records.

Fence, paint and rooftop violations prompt further review

At 935 Catalonia Avenue, a fence was constructed without a permit and may not comply with city setback or design requirements. Staff have been in contact with the property owner to determine whether a variance or removal will be required.

Meanwhile, 152 Almeria Avenue is cited for repainting a building in a historic district without approval. The new color, allegedly, does not conform to the city’s historic palette and the owner did not seek a certificate of appropriateness. The staff recommendation includes either repainting or seeking retroactive review through the Historic Preservation Board.

In a commercial case at 4001 Salzedo Street, rooftop mechanical equipment was installed without permits or required screening. City rules mandate that such systems not be visible from street level. Drawings for retroactive approval have been submitted, but the case remains open.

Work without permits at 217 Madeira Avenue

The agenda also includes 217 Madeira Avenue, where city staff report that interior work was performed without permits. The scope includes plumbing, flooring, and electrical modifications. The owner has acknowledged the oversight, according to staff records, and is now working with city officials to remedy the situation.

At 1414 Galiano Street, several signs were installed at a commercial property without permits or review by the Design Review Board. These signs may violate city codes for size, placement, or aesthetics. Staff are awaiting permit applications and may recommend removal if standards are not met.

Continued case

An ongoing case at 600 Biltmore Way will also return for board review. It involves expired permits and unauthorized rooftop installations. The board had issued a prior order, and staff are expected to provide an update on enforcement efforts.

Enforcement and oversight in context

The Construction Regulation Board functions as the city’s administrative forum for adjudicating alleged violations of building, zoning and design codes. Board members are charged with ensuring that property owners follow procedures and meet standards designed to preserve the city’s character and ensure safety.

Cases are heard publicly, and affected parties are sworn in before giving testimony. Residents may comment by signing in at the meeting or joining via Zoom and raising their hand during the hearing. The board may impose fines, recommend corrective action, or continue cases for further review.

As Coral Gables continues to experience steady construction activity, the July 14 meeting illustrates how even small changes—a paint color, a fence, a sign—can trigger city oversight. For property owners, the message remains consistent: Permits first, then projects.

This Post Has 3 Comments

  1. Beatriz La Rosa

    There seem to be more violstions of density by developers which are not reviewed by anyone. The traffic is dense and parking impossible and yet high density buildings keep popping up. I.e. the building across the post office on Valencia. How did that happen? B La Rosa p

    1. Teresita Carmona

      You are so right! I ask the same question about that building across the post office, “How did that happen?”
      Ugly, massive, rentals….. Obviously they don’t care.

  2. Lynn Guarch-Pardo

    1. Ask Rhonda Anderson how the massive building on Valencia across from the post office happened.
    2. What’s the status of the unpermitted work done on the lower level lobby at the Biltmore Hotel, which is a National Historic Landmark? Mum’s the word on that situation.

Leave a Reply