Coral Gables commission revives Mobility Hub with ‘Carved by Nature’ design

The Coral Gables Commission voted to advance the “Carved by Nature” design for the proposed Mobility Hub, shown here in a rendering as viewed from Miracle Mile.
An architect’s rendering of Coral Gables’ planned 145-foot Mobility Hub, where the city played both developer and regulator — blurring the line it usually enforces on private builders.

By Coral Gables Gazette staff

After years of delay and redesign, the Coral Gables City Commission voted Tuesday to revive the city’s proposed Mobility Hub, selecting the Carved by Nature design for a structure expected to cost more than $60 million and replace two aging downtown garages.

The 3–1 vote ended a one-hour debate over height, cost, and public input, directing staff to refine the design and return with updated cost estimates and financing strategies, including a potential public-private partnership for the redevelopment of Garage 4. Mayor Vince Lago, Vice Mayor Rhonda Anderson and Commissioner Richard Lara supported the motion. Commissioner Melissa Castro opposed. Commissioner Ariel Fernandez was absent.

Years of delay and redesign

The Mobility Hub has been under discussion for nearly a decade. The plan calls for replacing Garage 1 on Andalusia Avenue and consolidating functions of Garage 4, both considered obsolete. Garage 1’s façade has failed, and Garage 4 lacks an elevator making it Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) non-compliant. Together they account for more than 600 spaces, and staff argue a modern hub is necessary to sustain downtown, which generates nearly 30 percent of city property-tax revenues.

Early concepts envisioned a Mediterranean-style structure with retail and a rooftop park. Costs, once estimated at $30 to $40 million, rose above $60 million as construction prices surged, halting the project. In 2023, the commission ordered a redesign, asking for a more open, contemporary approach. The city retained Gensler, a global architecture, design, and planning firm, to do the design work.

Funding has also been contentious. A $975,000 earmark for electric-vehicle and solar components survived the 2022 state budget, but other requests were vetoed by the governor. Locally, officials have proposed redeveloping Garage 4 to offset costs — an idea that surfaced again Tuesday and drew pointed opposition.

Three design options

The item opened with a presentation by Shamim Ahmadzadegan, design director and principal at Gensler, who outlined three concepts — Vertical Canopy, Carved by Nature, and Decotropical. Each was offered as an alternative to faux-Mediterranean garages that, the design team argued, “force unsafe, dark interiors.”

Each option envisioned a building of just under 150 feet, a height dictated by the requirement for 626 spaces on a narrow site.

Mayor Lago supported Carved by Nature, describing past garages as unwelcoming and unsafe. “Downtown is 27 percent of our tax base — we can’t keep delaying this,” he said. He requested a shade study and suggested commissioning a wall mural from Hernan Bas. He also urged the city to pursue a public-private partnership for Garage 4 to help finance construction.

The project is widely viewed as central to Lago’s legacy. For more than a decade he has championed the idea of a mobility hub, arguing that modernized parking and transportation facilities are vital to downtown’s economic health. Tuesday’s vote represented the first time a commission majority aligned with his push to take the project off the shelf.

Vice Mayor Anderson also supported Option 2, emphasizing practicality. She recommended vines on sunlit walls instead of shaded ramps and suggested activating “dead corners” with features such as a climbing gym or juice bar. She noted that prior public feedback had leaned toward Art Deco with greenery and said she was receiving live messages of support for Option 2 during the meeting.

Commissioner Lara argued that the project was overdue, warning against “paralysis through overanalysis.” He called Garage 1 unsafe for families and said the new hub would support downtown businesses. Of the designs, he said, “Number one is pretty, but number two fits better.”

Commissioner Castro pressed hardest on the hub’s height and scale. She asked why the structure needed to be so tall, remarked that some designs resembled Lincoln Road more than Coral Gables, and insisted residents should have direct input before the city committed $60 million. When she learned Garage 4 could be sold to help finance the project, she said she would not support the plan. “This scale does not fit with the historic downtown,” she said.

Staff and public input

City Manager Peter Iglesias said the 626-space requirement comes from combining Garages 1 and 4, both of which he described as obsolete. He emphasized that Garage 4 would remain in use until the new hub was complete, and noted that the consolidation plan has been studied for more than a decade.

Parking and Mobility Director Monica Beltran called parking a “quality-of-life issue,” saying that two garages a block apart was impractical. She stressed the importance of safe circulation inside the hub and highlighted its proximity to trolley service and its capacity for EV charging.

Public comment showed the same divide. Maria Cruz opposed the hub, saying residents have rejected it before. Jackson “Rip” Holmes supported building the garage but opposed selling Garage 4, warning of overdevelopment. Lisa Detournay, appearing on Zoom, urged eliminating the ground-floor retail and rooftop park to reduce the hub’s height and aligned with Castro’s concerns.

Vote and next steps

After an hour of discussion, the commission voted to proceed with Carved by Nature. The motion, which Anderson made and Lara seconded, directs staff to return at the next meeting with refined costs and a financing plan, including a public-private partnership for Garage 4.

The decision revives a project that has been stalled for years. With one commissioner opposed, one absent, and residents still voicing concerns, questions about cost and scale remain as the Mobility Hub moves into its next phase.

This Post Has 6 Comments

  1. Kandace

    They can’t come up with a smaller, less costly garage that won’t be a monster in our beautiful City?
    What is wrong with our leaders???!!!
    IT DOESN’T BELONG HERE!

  2. Jack Swyteck

    Ghastly

  3. Absolutely not

    This is one of the reasons we wanted incompetent Inglesis out. The million dollar waste is now going to be a 2 million dollar waste. Lago, Anderson, Lara needs to stop this mess. It does not fit. Oh I forgot, you know better than us and you need to make decisions for us. I am so sickened by our leadership after 32 years in the Gables. What are you voters
    thinking?

  4. Lynn Guarch-Pardo

    Gensler may be the “be all, end all”, as a global architecture, design, and planning firm, but they continue to present designs which are absolutely incompatible in downtown Coral Gables. This design belongs on Brickell, with the rest of the monstrosities which destroyed that historic avenue.
    Their prior design of several years ago, loved and promoted by CM Iglesias, was shot down by the residents, both due to its overpowering size as well as its incompatible design for a building in the heart of our city. So, here we go again.
    Maybe a different architecture firm would understand the need for a design that doesn’t stick out like a sore thumb. And if the goal weren’t to shove all the parking spaces in one garage, the size would be more manageable.
    Commissioner Castro suggested the residents should be allowed to provide input on a project estimated to cost at least $60 million dollars, but the powers that be arrogantly espouse the opinion that having been voted in by the residents (none of them had the vote of this resident), the majority needs not to take the residents’ opinions into account.
    I hope the few voters who actually voted for Anderson, Lago, and Lara are paying attention. You elected three power-driven individuals who have eliminated your right to voice an opinion.

  5. Jessica

    Is it a mobility hub or a garage? A garage is a component of a mobility hub. I support a mobility hub. If Coral Gables stopped all development today, we would still be plagued by congestion because I got news for you, our neighbors north, south, east and west are not stopping development and their drivers are coming through Coral Gables.

    A mobility hub offers the opportunity to mitigate the congestion that’s here now and what’s coming. The problem I see with the “mobility hub” previously pitched is there was no real mobility plan attached to it. It was a garage called a mobility hub.

    When developing a mobility hub, the goal is convenience: instead of juggling multiple stops and figuring out transportation connections on your own, a mobility hub brings everything together so you can easily combine different types of transportation for a smoother, faster trip.

    So what’s the plan to bring the transportation connections to this “mobility hub”?

  6. Justin Rong

    What an incredible waste of money on a garage so that Lago ‘s cronies in construction can make millions. We can’t afford this garage that identifies as a mobility hub. Get rid of Lago.

Leave a Reply