Controversial Mobility Hub clears key hurdle despite split commission and height concerns

The Coral Gables Commission voted to advance the “Carved by Nature” design for the proposed Mobility Hub, shown here in a rendering as viewed from Miracle Mile.
An architect’s rendering of Coral Gables’ planned 145-foot Mobility Hub, where the city played both developer and regulator — blurring the line it usually enforces on private builders.

By Coral Gables Gazette staff

In a split 3–2 vote, the Coral Gables Commission approved a site plan for the long-debated Mobility Hub at its October 28 meeting. The project, slated to replace the existing Parking Garage 1 on Andalusia Avenue between Salzedo Street and Ponce de Leon Boulevard, marks a major step forward after years of delay and division.

Shelved several years ago when the previous commission lost enthusiasm for the concept and its price tag, the Mobility Hub resurfaced this year following the spring elections. With Mayor Vince Lago now joined by ally Commissioner Richard Lara, approval seemed likely as the city looks to expand downtown parking and modernize its public facilities.

While the project’s sleek, nature-inspired “Carved by Nature” design received praise from some commissioners, others maintained that the proposed height – nearly 150 feet -remains excessive for the city’s scale and character.

Height continues to be main sticking point among commissioners

Height dominated much of the discussion, revealing a familiar split among commissioners. Commissioner Ariel Fernandez voted against the project, calling the building “too tall, even if it is within the height that is allowed.” He added, “It doesn’t fall in line with the Miracle Mile side of the building.”

Commissioner Melissa Castro echoed that sentiment, reaffirming her opposition. “From day one, I’ve not supported this,” she said. “This is not what I promised. I agree we need a garage – actually two garages – but not at this scale.”

Both pointed to resident concerns that the project’s 145-foot height towers over nearby structures. Resident Lisa De Tournay said she was “disappointed” the city appeared to be moving forward despite objections of many residents over many years. “This is supposed to be a parking garage,” she said. “The top floor should be for parking, we could reduce it by at least one floor. I don’t like the height, especially compared to the surrounding buildings.”

Still, the mayor defended the design’s scale as necessary given the narrow lot. “The reason why the building has to go vertical is because of the depth of the lot,” he said. “If we had a deeper lot, we could build lower. But this is the only way to fit the needed parking.” 

Lago added that the 145-foot height remains within the MX3 zoning limit of 150 feet and that the city could have gone up to 190 feet if they designed it in a Mediterranean style which qualifies for additional height limits. Even so, the mayor, City Manager Peter Iglesias and others acknowledged that parking garages did not lend themselves to that style of architecture as evidenced by missteps on the other such parking garages in the city.

Lara backed the mayor’s position. “We have zoning and code that establish the maximum permitted height,” he said. “This building falls well within those parameters.” The commissioner added that it was a misstatement for residents or others to qualify the Mobility Hub project as over development or development out of control. 

Castro countered by pointing out that as owner of the property, the city had full control of what is built on the site. “This is our property, do we need to exercise and build as far as we can go?” she asked, adding that she was willing to compromise but not at this scale. “This is in our hands.”

Different uses and design

Architects from M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc presented the latest design, which they described as inspired by Coral Gables’ “lushness and natural beauty.” The “Carved by Nature” concept features a champagne-toned façade with a delicate foliage pattern and extensive landscaping, creating a design intended to help the building blend into its surroundings.

Designers detailed upgrades, including additional art display areas, pedestrian-friendly paseo connections to Miracle Mile, and improved hurricane engineering. “It’s light and airy, with an emphasis on nature,” City Manager Peter Iglesias said.

The rooftop design also evolved in response to the city’s new nearby parks, allowing more flexibility. Instead of a child-focused playground, the roof can now serve as a multifunctional community space for concerts, yoga sessions, movies, and restaurant seating.

Lara called the proposed designs “beautiful and exciting,” adding that it “bodes well for the future of Coral Gables.” Vice Mayor Rhonda Anderson agreed, describing the preferred version as “more lacey and flowing.”

Resident interaction

While input from residents at the meeting was limited, those who spoke were divided. Some expressed frustration that the city was pressing ahead with a project they felt lacked adequate public input and objected to the height, while others insisted that the project was needed and would bring life to the downtown area.

Castro insisted that residents had not been able to adequately weigh in on the project. “We are approving this without voter input,” she said. “We’re not really talking to the neighbors.”

Lago countered that the process has been public and transparent and Lara agreed. “We’ve had renderings available, we’ve had public comment, and only a handful of residents have appeared against it. That’s an implicit endorsement in my view.”

The vice mayor added that at a recent Garden Club meeting, “not a single person said they didn’t like the design” and that she hadn’t received any emails against the project.

Despite the differences, commissioners agreed the current garage is in dire need of replacement. “The state of that parking structure is embarrassing,” Lago said. “We can do better.” He emphasized that the new Mobility Hub would not only improve parking availability but also serve as an economic driver for Miracle Mile.

This Post Has 4 Comments

  1. Wm. H. Arthur IV

    The project has not yet appeared before the Board of Architects, recall that is the venue where public input regarding the design is made.
    Furthermore, the Gensler design is not developed enough and should first be brought to “Preliminary” stage before conducting a meaningful review.

  2. Michael Steffens

    I just love that, “blend into its surroundings”.
    The problem here isn’t the decoration or the height of this building. The problem is the location of this building. For the future health of Miracle Mile this is probably the worst location that could be chosen.
    Consider Miracle Mile a shopping mall. Shopping malls are designed to steer pedestrian traffic to where it needs to be. In the era of the shopping mall the department store anchor tenants were always placed at the far ends of the mall. They were the traffic draws. People would walk between the department stores driving the traffic past all the smaller shops in the middle.
    Placing the parking garages (including the existing Aragon garage across from Books and Books) in the middle of Miracle Mile is damning the east and west ends of Miracle Mile to slow deaths. The biggest generator of traffic on Miracle Mile, Hillstone, is in the center of the street and there are many more close restaurants up and down Ponce. If all the parking garages are located nearby, the people visiting Hillstone, and the other concentration of restaurants in the center of the street, will have no reason to walk any further.
    If, on the other hand, the garage was located on the City parking garage site to the north of Publix and a pedestrian access path was provided mid 300 block the traffic would be steered past many more merchants.
    The construction of this project at its current location is being pushed thru the City for convenience. Its problems will only be realized after completion, much like the Miracle Mile Street Scape.

  3. Lynn Guarch-Pardo

    Public input? There is absolutely no interest in public input on the part of Lago, Lara, Anderson or Iglesias, who are trying to ram this incompatible, overpriced, oversized “mobility hub”‘ down our throats, when what we need is a garage. Just a garage. Or as Commissioner Castro correctly stated, two garages. Not this monstrosity.
    It seems that meetings of the Garden Club are now a viable measure of determining what the residents want.
    And I guess Iglesias and Lago have forgotten the residents’ petition against the proposed “mobility hub” during the prior administration. The idea was dropped because of the opposition to it, and the outrageous cost. Now the current cost wasn’t even discussed at the commission meeting, but the go-ahead was given via their 3-2 vote. Kudos to Commissioners Castro and Fernandez for standing firm on their commitments to the residents.

  4. Mrs. Maria C. Cruz

    And do not forget who is in charge of this project, isn’t that one of the reasons Iglesias was brought back? Has everyone forgotten the issues still facing the Miracle Mile pavers, the Police and Fire Building leaking windows, roof, A/C, etc, the Development Services Building windows, fire alarm, etc. What do these projects have in common? Hint, hint, the involvement of Peter Iglesias!! OOPS, and Vince Lago, of course.

    The more I think about everything that is going on in OUR City Beautiful a popular saying keeps coming to mind: FOLLOW THE MONEY!!

Leave a Reply