Thomas Wells, a candidate for the Coral Gables City Commission Group III seat, addressed residents during a virtual forum hosted by Gables Neighbors United on April 16, less than a week before his runoff election against Richard Lara.
The forum, billed as a “Meet and Ask” session, was held via Zoom and drew about 30 participants. Gables Neighbors United, a resident-led political action committee that has endorsed Wells, organized the event and promoted his campaign as free from special interest influence.
“He has not accepted a dime in campaign donations from any developer or special interest group,” the group stated in its event advertisement—a claim supported by a review of Wells’ campaign finance filings.
Wells, an attorney with a private practice in Coral Gables, opened the session by encouraging civic participation. “It’s not just my fight; it’s everyone’s fight,” he said. “This is so residents maintain control of Coral Gables.”
During the hour-long session, Wells answered a broad range of questions, including a rapid-fire round covering some of the most debated topics in the city:
- City Manager: Wells said he supports conducting an independent search process for future vacancies in the city manager role but expressed no intention to replace current City Manager Alberto Parjus.
- Little Gables Annexation: When asked about his position on the annexation, Wells responded emphatically, “Hell no,” repeating the phrase for emphasis.
- Taxes: Wells supports maintaining the city’s current millage rate, which he noted is the fourth lowest in Miami-Dade County.
- Commission Pay Raises: While Wells said he would not vote to rescind the raises passed in 2023, he criticized how they were implemented and said such decisions should be made by residents. He added that the current salaries are now more consistent with those in similar municipalities.
- Overdevelopment: Wells said he opposes granting exceptions or variances to the city’s zoning code, describing a recent conversation with a property owner who sought an exemption because a neighbor had received one. “At some point we have to draw the line,” Wells said. “I’m sorry about that, but I’m going to draw a line for the next four years.”
Wells also addressed political endorsements, stating that he had not sought the backing of current commissioners Ariel Fernandez, Melissa Castro, or Kirk Menendez, who vacated the Group III seat to run for mayor. He added that he believed elected officials should not participate in endorsements, calling out Mayor Vince Lago and Vice Mayor Rhonda Anderson by name. “They should have sat on the sidelines,” he said.
Restoring decorum to City Commission meetings was also a central theme. Wells said he would support adherence to Robert’s Rules of Order—already codified in city regulations—as a way to improve the tone of discussions on the dais, which he said had become increasingly combative over the past two years.
On economic development, Wells was candid when asked how he would address the vacancies on Miracle Mile.
“I don’t have a plan to have those spaces occupied,” he said, though he committed to studying the issue. He added that he favored a mix of shops and restaurants on the corridor, expressing concern that an overconcentration of “world-class” dining and luxury retail was neither productive nor sustainable.
In response to a question about educational improvements for families, Wells said he would need to study the issue before proposing action and expressed reluctance to commit city funds. “I don’t want to invest money only for the school board to use it elsewhere,” he said, referencing concerns that local funding could be diverted to other municipalities.
The meeting, while focused on policy and serious issues, included lighter moments. When asked how he would address the city’s peacock nuisance, Wells jokingly suggested the city might check their passports—a reference to Coral Gables’ recent 287(g) agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which allows local police to perform certain federal immigration enforcement functions.
Asked whether he had safety concerns given recent threats and harassment of public officials, Wells again turned to humor. “I have cameras all over the house,” he said, adding that he parks in the garage while his wife parks outside, “more in the line of any potential attackers.”
The runoff election between Wells and Lara will be held Tuesday, April 22. Early voting is scheduled for Saturday and Sunday, April 19 and 20, at the Coral Gables Branch Library.
This Post Has 3 Comments
Bravo, Tom! Common sense answers instead of pretending to have all the answers before being elected. He truly cares about our city and its residents, and it shows! Civility and a sense of humor are excellent qualities, besides all his professional ones. And Bravo to the Gables Gazette for good, objective, accurate reporting.
I attended the virtual meeting, your reporting has invented and glamorized what he supposedly said. Half of what the gazette says is not true, and Tom Wells did not say such things. I was going to vote for him, but after the meeting, I decided I’m not going to vote for him. He ignored a couple of people that were urging him to talk about the overdevelopment of the City. I think Tom Wells is not listening.
Wow! I attended the virtual meeting also, and everything the Gazette reported I heard for myself! Every single thing. Tom Wells did speak about overdevelopment and about not granting zoning changes. He answered every question. Not only is Tom Wells listening, but he tells the truth.
Are you really going to vote for someone who hasn’t voted in Coral Gables elections for 25 years? The last time Lara voted in our city elections was 1999! Is that someone you think is listening??? Or someone you want to represent you? Our city hasn’t mattered enough to him to participate in our elections. I’ve lived here for 35 years and I’ve never missed voting in our elections because not only is it a right, but it’s a privilege. Lara has misrepresented the length of time he’s lived in the city…completely leaving out the 18 years he lived in Westchester. He has a problem telling the truth. He says he’s all for transparency and integrity, but he doesn’t tell the truth. His runoff campaign is being backed by Vince Lago, Do you think
think he’s an independent candidate???
Tom Wells hasn’t taken a penny from anyone. His campaign has been completely self-funded. And he’s been involved in our city for years, speaking at commission meetings and town halls and serving on the Charter Review Committee.
There is no comparison. Tom Wells will most definitely have the city and its residents’ best interests at heart. And he’ll get my vote.